Le Brette Stacey Winn v. Secretary of Corrections
Petitioner: Le Brette Stacey Winn
CDCR: Secretary of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2017cv09144
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Alexander F. MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations 23 of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Petition 1 is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Le Brette Stacey Winn v. Secretary of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cdcr: Secretary of Corrections
Represented By: Shira Seigle Markovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Le Brette Stacey Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?