Rami Nassif v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Rami Nassif |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Does 1-10, inclusive and DOES 1-100 Inclusive |
2:2017cv09205 |
December 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
S James Otero |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1444 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 CORRECTED NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice of Clerical Error (G-11), #21 , Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court (CV-103) - optional html form #20 Incorrect pdf images were attached to no. 21 and incomplete image to no. 22 and were immediately removedand replaced with correct images of transmittal letter and clerical error with copy of remand letter attached. (lc) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court (CV-103) - optional html form #20 : Incorrect pdf image of the remand minutes was attached and immediately removed and replaced with the Remand transmittal letter image, a copy of which is attached to this notice for reference. (lc) (Main Document 21 replaced on 2/2/2018) (lc). |
Filing 20 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, No.BC684609 (lc) (Main Document 20 replaced on 2/2/2018) (lc). |
Filing 19 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND #12 . Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC684609. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc) |
Filing 18 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif. (Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 17 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge S. James Otero. Plaintiff Rami Nassif has filed a First Amended Complaint within the time allotted by Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Case [ECF No. 8], filed January 2, 2018, is hereby DENIED as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 15 OPPOSITION opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of D. Dennis La in Support of Wells Fargo's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Exhibit 1-2 to D. Dennis La's Declaration in Support of Wells Fargo's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand)(La, D) |
Filing 14 NOTICE Intent to File First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif. (Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif, identifying Rami Nassif. (Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif. Motion set for hearing on 2/12/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of firm name by Deborah P Gutierrez attorney for Plaintiff Rami Nassif. Changing firm name to Thrive Law PLC. Filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif. (Gutierrez, Deborah) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit G-H to Supplemental Notice of Removal)(La, D) |
Filing 9 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #8 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B to Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Exhibit C-E to Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint)(La, D) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 2/5/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) (La, D) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/5/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 3/19/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (clee) |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (clee) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Rami Nassif. Filed in State Court on 11/22/2017 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal (car) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., identifying Wells Fargo & Company. (La, D) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (La, D) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District, case number BC684609 Receipt No: 0973-21018227 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F to Notice of Removal) (Attorney D Dennis La added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(La, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.