Dominique Hoa Barnum et al v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
| Dominique Hoa Barnum and Melanio Santiago Lim |
| Curvature LLC, DOES and Life Insurance Company of North America |
| 2:2017cv09302 |
| December 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John F. Walter |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 23 by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, including without limit the Complaint of Plaintiffs, and including without limit any claims for costs and attorneys' fees. (iv)
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on February 23, 2018, Dkt. No. 21 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action withou t prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before April 9, 2018. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until April 9, 2018. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
