JITRADE, Inc. v. Zulily, LLC et al
| JITRADE, INC. |
| Does and ZULILY, LLC |
| 2:2018cv00070 |
| January 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
(IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Dismissal by Judge R. Gary Klausner. On May 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant alleging claims for copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, and contributory copyright infringement. This case, 17-cv-0341-RGK-PLA ("Case 1"), involved two-dimensional graphic artwork, JIC-28, SND 1505_32A, and JIC-68, for use on textiles and garments. On October 16, 2017, Case 1 was dismissed for lack of prosecution after Plaintiff failed to appear at a scheduling conference, then failed to appear for an Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b), such a dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits. On January 3, 2018, Plaintiff filed the current action against Defendant alleging same claims, based on the same alleged copyrights. This action appears identical to Case 1. Based on the prior dismissal for lack of prosecution, the Court finds the current action an improper refiling of an action that has already been dismissed on the merits. The Court sua sponte dismisses this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
