Emily Elson et al v. Ashley Black et al
| Tilly Dorenkamp, Emily Elson, Jerry Gaines, Sue Grlicky, Stacy Haavisto, Michelle Lanum, Julia Lefebvre, Loretta Oakes, Arlene Rodriguez and Dina Salas |
| ADB Interests LLC, Ashley Diana Black International Holdings, LLC, Ashley Black and Does |
| 2:2018cv00116 |
| January 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A. Oliver |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 63 , and 64 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court STRIKES Defendants motions to dismiss and to strike (ECF Nos. 6364); DENIES Defendants motion to dismiss for insufficient process and failure to timely serve (ECF No. 47); and DENIES Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (ECF No. 46), but instead TRANSFERS the matter to the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER the action to the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, 515 Rusk Street, Houston, TX 77002. Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 45, 48) are DENIED without prejudice in light of the Courts order to transfer. Case electronically transferred to USDC Southern District of Texas 9/25/19.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) Modified on 9/25/2019 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
