Barry Rosen v. Hollywood Show, LLC et al
Barry Rosen |
Does, Hollywood Show, LLC and Myron Ross |
2:2018cv00215 |
January 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Christina A. Snyder |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT MYRON Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file a renewed motion for default judgment. (lc) |
Filing 91 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE37 64 AND PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER (1) TO SHOW CAUSE (2) TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT COMPLETION (3) MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULING AND (4) PLAINTIFFS RENEWED MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT HOLLYWOOD SHOW LLCS ANSWER 86 . The Court DENIES plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings.The Court DENIES plaintiffs motion for terminating sancti ons.The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part plaintiffs ex parte application to modify the scheduling order. The Court hereby extends the time to complete mediation to July 1, 2019. The pretrial conference/motions in limine hearing date is contin ued to August 5, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., and the trial date is continued to August 13, 2019, at 9:30 A.M.The Court DENIES plaintiffs ex parte application for an order to show cause regarding Hollywood Shows insurance coverage.The Court DENIES plaintiffs ex parte application to renew his motion to strike Hollywood Shows answer. (lc). Modified on 6/5/2019. (lc). |
Filing 63 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE ANSWER OF DEFENDANT HOLLYWOOD SHOW 41 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court denies plaintiff's motion to strike Hollywood Shows answer, without prejudice to plaintiff's renewing his motion after the April 22, 2019 status conference if Hollywood Show is unable to demonstrate that it has complied with section 23305. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder:DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS {13]. The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date of April 9, 2018 is vacated, and the matter is hereby taken under submission.foregoing, the Court GRANTS defendants motion to dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein on or before April 30, 2018. (lc). Modified on 4/5/2018 .(lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.