United States of America et al v. Jervis B. Webb Company et al
| California Department of Toxic Substances Control and United States of America |
| Jervis B. Webb Company and Jervis B. Webb Company of California |
| 2:2018cv00234 |
| January 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
CONSENT DECREE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Motion 15 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that within 30 days after the effective date, Jervis B. Webb Company and Jervis B. Webb Company of California (collectively "Settling Defendants&quo t;) shall pay to United States of America ("United States"), on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") $3,450,000 in payment for Response Costs and in avoidance of the Transfe r and $50,000 to the California Department of toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") for Response Costs. Settling Defendants shall provide to EPA and DTSC, upon request, access to copies of all records, reports, documents and other informat ion within their possession or control or that of their contractors or agents relating to activities at the Site. This Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment between and among the United States, DTSC and Settling Defendants. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
