Lori Hoeft v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
Plaintiff: Lori Hoeft
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc, Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. and DOES 1-10
Case Number: 2:2018cv00293
Filed: January 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2018 Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court,County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court,County of Los Angeles. (yl)
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. 9) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion to Remand is GRANTED, and the accompanying request for attorneys fees is DENIED. The case is hereby REMANDED to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Case No. BC611993. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
April 30, 2018 Filing 20 MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. #9 ) ; and SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court takes the Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. The scheduling conference is not held. The Court will set dates on the final ruling on the Motion, if necessary. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of settlement. Defendant has requested a settlement demand but has not yet received one. Counsel agree that private mediation would be beneficial. Counsel shall confer and file a joint report by May 7, 2018, regarding the agreed upon private neutral and the anticipated date of its completion. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (pso)
April 20, 2018 Filing 19 JOINT RULE 16(B) / 26(F) REPORT REPORT filed by Plaintiff Lori Hoeft. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates for Civil Cases)(Wilson, Atoy)
March 19, 2018 Filing 18 REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Lori Hoeft. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Atoy H. Wilson ISO of Plaintiff's Reply, #2 Declaration of Lori Hoeft ISO of Plaintiff's Reply)(Wilson, Atoy)
March 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. #9 13 ) AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, continues the Motion and Scheduling Conference from April 23, 2018 to April 30, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report shall be filed no later than April 20, 2018. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 5, 2018 Filing 16 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Beth Biggs, #2 Declaration of James A. Bowles, #3 Exhibits 1-6)(Bowles, James)
February 28, 2018 Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Erika A Silverman counsel for Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc.. Adding Erika A. Silverman as counsel of record for Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Media Inc., and Mike Shippey for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Media Inc., and Mike Shippey. (Silverman, Erika)
February 28, 2018 Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elissa L Gysi counsel for Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc.. Adding Elissa L. Gysi as counsel of record for Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Media Inc., and Mike Shippey for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Media Inc., and Mike Shippey. (Gysi, Elissa)
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND REQUEST FOR JUST COSTS AND ACTUAL EXPENSES (DKT. #9 ) AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, continues the Motion and Scheduling Conference April 2, 2018 to April 23, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. Any response to the Motion shall be filed by March 5, with the reply to be filed by March 19, 2018. The parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report shall be filed no later than April 13, 2018. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING DOE PARTIES #11-#50 by Judge John A. Kronstadt:Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants #11 through #50. (bp)
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES by Judge John A. Kronstadt. See document for details. (lom)
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Scheduling Conference set for 4/2/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A. Kronstadt.) (mrgo)
February 12, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Lori Hoeft. Motion set for hearing on 4/2/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Atoy H. Wilson, #2 Exhibit to Declaration of Atoy H. Wilson) (Wilson, Atoy)
January 23, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING WITH STATE COURT AND SERVING UPON ADVERSE PARTY NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bowles, James)
January 16, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
January 16, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap)
January 12, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Lori Hoeft. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/1/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
January 12, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/29/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)
January 12, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiff Lori Hoeft. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/1/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
January 12, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/7/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) Modified on 1/16/2018 (ghap).
January 12, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/29/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E-7)(ghap)
January 12, 2018 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 served on 01/12/2018. (Bowles, James)
January 12, 2018 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc identifying Charter Communications Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Bowles, James)
January 12, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants -- All Defendants, identifying Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Media Inc., Time Warner Pacific West LLC, TWC Administration LLC, Charter Communications Inc., Mike Shippey. (Bowles, James)
January 12, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc, Time Warner Cable Media Inc. (Bowles, James)
January 12, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior, case number BC611993 Receipt No: 0973-21092619 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Media Inc, Time Warner Cable Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney James Allen Bowles added to party Mike Shippley(pty:dft), Attorney James Allen Bowles added to party Time Warner Cable Inc(pty:dft), Attorney James Allen Bowles added to party Time Warner Cable Media Inc(pty:dft))(Bowles, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lori Hoeft v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Media Inc
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Shippley
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Media Inc.
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Hoeft
Represented By: Kenneth R Myers
Represented By: Atoy Hari Wilson
Represented By: Jay S Rothman
Represented By: Kevin Mahoney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?