Lori Hoeft v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al

Plaintiff: Lori Hoeft
Defendant: Does, Mike Shippley, Time Warner Cable Inc and Time Warner Cable Media Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00293
Filed: January 12, 2018
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R. Wilner
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 2, 2018 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. 9) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion to Remand is GRANTED, and the accompanying request for attorneys fees is DENIED. The case is hereby REMANDED to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Case No. BC611993. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
April 30, 2018 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. 9 ) ; and SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court takes the Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. The scheduling conf erence is not held. The Court will set dates on the final ruling on the Motion, if necessary. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of settlement. Defendant has requested a settlement demand but has not yet received one. Counsel agree that private mediation would be beneficial. Counsel shall confer and file a joint report by May 7, 2018, regarding the agreed upon private neutral and the anticipated date of its completion. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (pso)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lori Hoeft v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Shippley
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Media Inc.
Represented By: James Allen Bowles
Represented By: Casey Lee Morris
Represented By: Elissa L Gysi
Represented By: Erika A Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Hoeft
Represented By: Kevin Mahoney
Represented By: Atoy Hari Wilson
Represented By: Kenneth R Myers
Represented By: Jay S Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?