Chalena Simpson v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
| Chalena Simpson |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and Exxon Mobil Corporation |
| Eve H. Wagner |
| 2:2018cv00312 |
| January 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Gail J Standish |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement (Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doty, Martha) |
|
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Eve H. Wagner has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Eve Wagner may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Chalena Simpson(Magee, Howard) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doty, Martha) |
|
|
|
|
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation.. (Doty, Martha) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE Attaching Standing Order for Cases Assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation. (Garcia, Lisa) |
|
|
|
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Chalena Simpson, attached to Notice of Removal as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Chalena Simpson in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/11/17, attached to Notice of Removal as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, (Doty, Martha) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation. (Doty, Martha) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC686547 Receipt No: 0973-21095394 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Martha S. Doty, #2 Declaration of Joel P. Webb, #3 Declaration of Josefina Bejarano, #4 Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #5 Exhibit A to Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #6 Exhibit B to Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #7 Exhibit C to Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #8 Exhibit D to Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #9 Exhibit E to Appendix of State Court Pleadings, #10 Certificate of Service to Superior Court and Adverse Party) (Attorney Martha S Doty added to party Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation(pty:dft))(Doty, Martha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.