Monica Rene Hall et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| David Jr Hall and Monica Rene Hall |
| Bank of America, NA, JP Morgan Chase, MERS, Mandalay Mortgage LLC, Select Portfolio Servicing, US Bank NA and WaMu |
| 2:2018cv00882 |
| February 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 12(b)(6) 7 ; MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) BY DEFENDANTS SPS, MERS, AND U.S. BANK AS TRUSTEE 14 ; D EFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS 36 ; AND PLAINTIFFS' VARIOUS FILINGS 9 11 13 28 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. For the foregoing reasons, the pending motions and other items are disposed of as follows: The C hase Motion and the SPS Motion are both GRANTED with leave to amend; The BofA Motion is DENIED as moot; The Motion to Remand is DENIED; The First Mandamus Petition and the Second Mandamus Petition are both DENIED; and The Motion to Disqualify is DENIED. Plaintiffs shall file a First Amended Complaint by no later than April 30, 2018.Failure to file a First Amended Complaint that complies with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by that date will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. (iv)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER TAKING THE HEARING ON THE MOTIONS 7 9 11 13 14 OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court fin ds that this matter is appropriate for submission on the papers without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set on the motions for March 26, 2018, (Defendant JPMorgan Chase's Motion to Dismiss Case 7 ; Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand Ca se 9 ; Plaintiffs' Motion (Writ of Mandamus) 11 ; Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify Legal Counsel 13 ; Defendants Mers, Select Portfolio Servicing, Us Bank Na's' Motion to Dismiss Case 14 ) are vacated and taken off calendar. The Court will issue an order. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
