U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution, Inc. v. Innovation Ventures, LLC et al
| U.S. Wholesale Outlet and Distribution, Inc. |
| Innovation Ventures, LLC and Living Essentials, LLC |
| 2:2018cv01077 |
| February 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
618
JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Consistent with the jurys verdict (Dkt. 517, 518), the Courts Order re: Plaintiffs Motion For Renewed Judgment As Matter of Law, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 601), and the Courts Orde r re: Adjudication of Plaintiffs Section 2(d) claim (Dkt. 599, 603), judgment is hereby entered: (1) against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs first Section 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a) cause of action; ( 2) against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs second Section 2(d) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a) cause of action; and (3) against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs fourth California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. &Prof. Code § 17200 cause of action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
|
Filing
599
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS- ORDER RE ADJUDICATION OF PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AND FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION AND PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. (DKT 582.) by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The matters before the Court are Plaintiffs' second cause of action, violation of Section 2(d) of the Robinson-Patman Act, and fifth cause of action, violation of California's Unfair Competition Law Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code§ 17200, and Plaintiffs' request for the issuance of a pe1manent in junction for adjudication by the Court. The Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs' second cause of action, as well as Plaintiffs' fifth cause of action, and the Court denies Plaintiffs' request for a pe1manent injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
