Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc v. Pacific Coast Feather Company et al
Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc |
Pacific Coast Feather Company and Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan |
2:2018cv01179 |
February 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M Olguin |
Gail J Standish |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc. (Jewett, Bradley) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan answer now due 4/13/2018; Pacific Coast Feather Company answer now due 4/13/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan; Pacific Coast Feather Company.(Nalty, Sean) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan answer now due 3/23/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan.(Attorney Sean P Nalty added to party Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan(pty:dft))(Nalty, Sean) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Pacific Coast Feather Company, Pacific Coast Feather Company Employee Health Care Plan. (esa) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc. (Jewett, Bradley) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: Summons cannot be issued because the incorrect court name is on the summons. The court name on the summons must show "Central District of California.". The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc. (Jewett, Bradley) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc, (Jewett, Bradley) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc. (Jewett, Bradley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21250278 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Bradley E Jewett added to party Culver City Surgical Specialists Inc(pty:pla))(Jewett, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.