Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Ideal Mechanical, Inc. et al
||Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Local Union No. 88 Dues, The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Section 401(K) Plan, The Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, The SMACNA of Southern Nevada Trades Program, The Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Inc. and The Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan
||James Richard Broughton, Ideal Mechanical, Inc., Catherine Anne Vuckovic and Frank S. Vuckovic
||February 14, 2018
||California Central District Court
||Paul L. Abrams
||Otis D. Wright
|Nature of Suit:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 21, 2018
ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT 9 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: (1) That the Company and Individual Defendants are indebted to the Plans inthe total amount of $62,387.31 as f ollows: $41,572.76 in audit contributions conducted for the period of 6/1/2014 through 2/28/2017; $8,314.55 in liquidated damages and interest for late payment or nonpayment of the audit contributions for the for the period of 6/1/2014 thro ugh 2/28/2017; and attorney's fees in the amount of $12,500.00. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of the Plans and against the Company and Individual Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $62,387.31 for audit contribution s, accrued liquidated damages, interest, attorney fees and costs, together with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of 12 percent per annum as of the date of the Judgment. (3) The Trust Funds can offset any benefits to which the Individual Def endants may be entitled by the amount noted in paragraph 1 above, less any credits. (4) The Court VACATES all pending dates and deadlines. (5) This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter through February 1, 2019 to enforce the terms of any judgm ent entered hereunder, to order appropriate injunctive and equitable relief, to make appropriate orders of contempt, and to increase the amount of judgment based upon additional sums owed to the Plans by Defendants. (6) The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?