Scott Ferrell v. Entertainment One Reality Productions, Inc. et al
| Scott Ferrell |
| Entertainment One Reality Productions, Inc. and Purveyors of Pop Productions, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv01287 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John F. Walter |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Third-Party Plaintiffs have judgment against Third-Party Defendant as follows: Amounts paid by third-party plaintiffs ENTERTAINMENT ONE REALITY PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation; and PURVEYORS OF POP PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, to plaintiff Scott Ferrell for amounts owed to Plaintiff for damage caused to certain of Plaintiff's personal property by third-party defendant PRIME STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC., a New Jersey corporation doing business as PRIME MOVING: $14,886.01. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER ON STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF SCOTT FERRELL'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 38 by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, including all claims stated herein by Plaintiff against Defendants. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
