United States of America v. $202,224.00 in Funds From Escrow Account At First Priority Escrow, Inc.
| United States of America |
| $202,224.00 in Funds From Escrow Account At First Priority Escrow, Inc. |
| Mary Hogan |
| Frank D Kortum and Chan Yong Jeong |
| 2:2018cv01556 |
| February 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 29 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States of America shall have judgment as to $63,500.00 of the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on that amou nt, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title, or interest therein. The government shall dispose of the funds in accordance with law. $138,724.00 of the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on said amount, shall be returned to Claimant Mary Hogan no later than 60 days from the entry of this judgment or Claimant's provision to the government of the bank information and personal identifiers described in this order, whichever is later. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
