Vivek Goyal v. Ford Motor Company
Vivek Goyal |
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inlcusive |
TK Holdings, Inc. and ROES |
2:2018cv01651 |
February 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Dean D Pregerson |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Florida, 1:18-cv-21287 filed 4/4/2018. (iv) |
Filing 17 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2599, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Federico A. Moreno 75 for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant top USC 28 Section 1407. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01613-DDP-JEM et al. (shb) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Exhibit (non-trial) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 14 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. REMAINING STATE COURT FILE as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel areencouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Vivek Goyal. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Barry, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-01613 DDP(JEMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Manuel L. Real to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01651 DDP(JEMx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Potential Tag-Along Actions in MDL 2599 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400.00 filing fee from Gordon & Rees. Re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . Receipt number LA168307. (ek) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-01613 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Cases)(Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Lead Counsel filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Hugret, Spencer) |
CONFORMED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Vivek Goyal on 9/9/2016, and attached to Notice of Removal as Tab 1. (jtil) |
CONFORMED ANSWER to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company on 3/30/2017, and attached to Notice of Removal as Tab 4. (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Vivek Goyal on 12/06/2016, and attached to Notice of Removal as Tab 2. (jtil) |
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT (FILED AS CROSS COMPLAINT IN STATE COURT) against Third Party Defendant TK Holdings, Inc., ROES 1 through 20, inclusive on 6/23/2018; Jury Demand, filed by Third Party Plaintiff Ford Motor Company. (jtil) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Notice (Other) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 02/28/2018. (Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Of Pendency Of Other Actions filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hanna, Timothy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC633305 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit Bankruptcy Order, #3 Declaration ISO Removal) (Attorney Timothy Alexander Hanna added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hanna, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.