Mi Sook Lee Kim v. Ford Motor Company et al
| SOO LEE MI KIM, Mi Sook Lee Kim and Jee Woo Lee |
| Galpin Motors Inc, Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. and Roes |
| 2:2018cv01684 |
| February 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Florida, 1:18-cv-21308 filed 4/4/2018. (iv) |
| Filing 14 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2599, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Federico A. Moreno 75 for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant top USC 28 Section 1407. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01613-DDP-JEM et al. (shb) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address ishttp://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Mi Sook Lee Kim. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Barry, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-01613 DDP(JEMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01684 DDP(JEMx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE Potential Tag Along Actions filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc. (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv- 01613 (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-Party Defendants Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Roes 1 through 10, inclusive ; Jury Demanded, filed by Third Party Plaintiff Ford Motor Company. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, filed by Plaintiffs Mi Sook Lee Kim, Jee Woo Lee. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 .(et) |
| CONFORMED COPY ORIGINAL FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive, filed by Plaintiffs Mi Sook Lee Kim, Jee Woo Lee. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/13/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO.1] (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Galpin Motors Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 .(et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANTS Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice (Other) #2 served on 02/28/2018. (Morrissey, Sean) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc. (Morrissey, Sean) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT Ford Motor Company, (Morrissey, Sean) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions filed by DEFENDANTS Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc. (Morrissey, Sean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los angeles County Superior Court, case number BC623551 Receipt No: 0973-21331703 - Fee: $400, filed by DEFENDANT Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SATE COURT FILE, #2 Exhibit BK ORDER, #3 Declaration MLA DECLARATION) (Attorney Sean Edward Morrissey added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Edward Morrissey added to party Galpin Motors Inc(pty:dft))(Morrissey, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
