Sean Poffenbarger v. Ford Motor Company et al
Sean Poffenbarger |
Ford Motor Company, BWM NVT Motors, BWM NVT Motors a California a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Serramonte Ford and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
2:2018cv01694 |
February 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Dean D Pregerson |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Florida, 1:18-cv-21312 filed 4/4/2018. (iv) |
Filing 15 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2599, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Federico A. Moreno 75 for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant top USC 28 Section 1407. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01613-DDP-JEM et al. (shb) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address ishttp://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Sean Poffenbarger. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Barry, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-01613 DDP(JEMx). Case transferred from Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01694 DDP(JEMx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn) |
Filing 10 NOTICE Potential Tag Along Actions filed by Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Ford Motor Company. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER ISSUED upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv- 01613 (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
CONFORMED COPY FILED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Sean Poffenbarger. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/13/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, filed by Plaintiff Sean Poffenbarger. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/29/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/2/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 .(et) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 .(et) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant BWM NVT Motors dba Serramonte Road. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Ford Motor Company, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #2 served on 2/28/2018. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Ford Motor Company. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions filed by Defendants BWM NVT Motors, Ford Motor Company. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC623546 Receipt No: 0973-21332497 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, BWM NVT Motors. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit BK Order, #3 Declaration MLA Declaration) (Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party BWM NVT Motors(pty:dft), Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Arens, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.