Keith Marsden v. Ford Motor Company et al
Keith Marsden |
Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, Walnut Creek Ford, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. and Roes |
2:2018cv01708 |
February 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Dean D Pregerson |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Florida, 1:18-cv-21319 filed 4/4/2018. (iv) |
Filing 15 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2599, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Federico A. Moreno 75 for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant top USC 28 Section 1407. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01613-DDP-JEM et al. (shb) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address ishttp://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Keith Marsden. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Barry, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-01613 DDP(JEMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Philip S. Gutierrez to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01708 DDP(JEMx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn) (Main Document 11 replaced on 3/13/2018) (rn). |
Filing 10 NOTICE Potential Tag Along Actions filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, Inc.. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv- 01613 (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, Inc., Jury Demand., filed by plaintiff Keith Marsden. (Filed in State Court 6/24/16, Submitted in Attach. 1; See Doc 1-1, p.4) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (Filed in State Court 3/13/17, submitted in Attach. 1; See Doc 1-1, p.45)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, Inc., filed by plaintiff Keith Marsden (Filed in State Court 1011/16, submitted in Attach. 1; See Doc 1-1, p.29)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint filed by defendant Walnut Creek Ford, Inc. (Filed in State Court 3/13/17. Submitted in Attach. 1; See Doc 1-1, p.53)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OP THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT FILED AS CROSS COMPLAINT IN STATE COURT against Third-Party Defendants Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Roes 1 through 20, inclusive ; Jury Demand, filed by Third Party Plaintiff Ford Motor Company. (Filed in State Court 6/23/17, submitted in Attach. 1; See Doc 1-1, p.61) (esa) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 2/28/2018. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford. (Arens, Mary) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC624998 Receipt No: 0973-21333541 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Walnut Creek Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit BK Order, #3 Declaration MLA Declaration) (Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party Walnut Creek Ford(pty:dft))(Arens, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.