Yvonne Quintero et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero |
| Bluesky Diversified, Inc., Ford Motor Company and Bluesky Diversified, Inc. doing business as Puente Hills Ford |
| 2:2018cv01912 |
| March 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 99 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report Pursuant to Minute Order Regarding Status of Matter filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Colon, Maite) |
Filing 98
ORDER RE: FORD'S MOTION RE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF IMPLIED WARRANTY VERDICT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Defendant Ford Motor Company's ("Ford") Motion Regarding the Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset #88 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court GRANTS Ford's Motion only as to justifiable and timely revocation. The Court DENIES Ford's Motion in all other respects. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer about next steps and file a Joint Status Report and Stipulation and Proposed Order as appropriate by 9/22/2023. (gk)
|
| Filing 97 REQUEST for Ruling Ford's Motion Regarding Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset filed by Plaintiff Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Colon, Maite) |
| Filing 96 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Maite Christine Colon counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Maite Colon as counsel of record for Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Attorney Maite Christine Colon added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Maite Christine Colon added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Colon, Maite) |
| Filing 95 MINUTES OF MOTION #88 Hearing held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The motion is taken under submission. The court orders the parties to file a status report by 2/23/2023. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (vdr) |
|
Filing 94
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S MOTION REGARDING LEGAL INSUFFICIENCY OF IMPLIED WARRANTY CLAIM AND AVAILABILITY OF EQUITABLE OFFSET #88 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The hearing date regarding this motion is continued from December 9, 2022, to February 3, 2023, at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 93 REPLY in Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset #88 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Chang, Andrew) |
| Filing 92 Notice of Electronic Filing re Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123) #91 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123) #89 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset #88 , MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion #90 , e-mailed to Darth Kadei Vaughn bounced due to unknown address error. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 91 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney R. Roger Kirnos counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Russell Higgins is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Kirnos, R.) |
| Filing 90 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset #88 filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Roger Kirnos In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion Regarding Legal Insufficiency Of Implied Warranty Claim And Availabilty Of Equitable Offset)(Tobisman, Cynthia) |
| Filing 89 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cynthia Elaine Tobisman counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Cynthia E. Tobisman as counsel of record for Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Attorney Cynthia Elaine Tobisman added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Cynthia Elaine Tobisman added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Tobisman, Cynthia) |
| Filing 88 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Legal Insufficiency of Implied Warranty Claim and Availability of Equitable Offset filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Motion set for hearing on 12/9/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Proposed Order) (Attorney Andrew L Chang added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft)) (Chang, Andrew) |
|
Filing 87
ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY ONLY by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to Stipulation of the parties (filed under 2:18-ml-02814-AB-PVCx, Dkt. No. 1329) and the judgment and mandate of the Ninth Circuit, the Court hereby orders as follows: The next proceeding in Quintero, et al. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:18-cv-01912-AB-FFM shall address the legal sufficiency of Plaintiffs' implied warranty claim and the availability of any equitable offset defense. Ford's motion on the legal sufficiency of Plaintiffs' implied warranty claim and availability of an equitable offset shall be filed by 10/21/2022. Plaintiffs' response to the motion shall be filed by 11/4/2022. Ford's reply shall be filed by 11/18/2022. The parties must comply with Local Rule 7-3. The hearing shall be held on 12/9/2022 at 10:00 AM. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 86
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REOPENING CASE AND ORDERING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: In light of the Ninth Circuit's Memorandum #84 and Mandate #85 , the Court hereby ORDERS that Quintero CV 18-01912 AB (FFMx) is REOPENED. The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer regarding how to proceed with Quintero in light of the Ninth Circuit's judgment, and to file a Stipulation and Proposed Order for doing so by 9/16/2022. The Court specifically urges the parties to discuss the potential for settling Quintero and to address the same in their Stipulation. (Case reopened. MD JS-5.) Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 85 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #66 , CCA # 20-55883. The judgment of this Court, entered July 21, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Memorandum #84 , REVERSED AND REMANDED.](mat) |
| Filing 84 MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #66 filed by Yvonne Quintero, Salvador Quintero. CCA # 20-55883. We conclude with an admonition to the parties. Better coordination among them would have been helpful to the district court's consideration of these post-trial issues and could have avoided significant post-trial and appellate litigation.REVERSED AND REMANDED. (car) |
| Filing 83 NOTICE OF LIEN filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Mikhov, Steve) |
|
Filing 82
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Amir Nassihi for Defendant Ford Motor Company in place of Attorneys Warren E. Platt and Katharine H. Adams #81 . (gk)
|
| Filing 81 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Amir Nassihi in place of attorney Katharine H. Adams filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nassihi, Amir) |
| Filing 80 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 12/10/19, 8:37 A.M.; 12/11/19, 9:45 A.M.; 12/12/19, 8:39 A.M.; 12/16/19, 8:55 A.M.; 12/17/19, 9:19 A.M re Transcript #79 , #76 , #75 , #78 , #77 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Jui, Chia) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 79 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/17/19, 9:19 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 78 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/16/19, 8:55 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 77 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/12/19, 8:39 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 76 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/11/19, 9:45 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 75 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/10/19, 8:37 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 74 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $3,889.72 in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. RE: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs re: Order, #64 , Judgment,, #65 , #69 (kr) |
| Filing 73 FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th CIRCUIT filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Amending Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #66 Filed On: 8/25/2020; Entered On: 8/25/2020; (Attachments: #1 Attachment A to Amended Notice of Appeal)(Kirnos, Radomir) |
|
Filing 72
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND OR ALTER JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.59(E) AND 60 [DKT. NO. 937] by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS that its ORDER GRANTING FORDS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND DENYING AS MOOT FORDS MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (MDL Dkt. No. 905, Quintero Dkt. No. 64) is hereby AMENDED to reflect that the Court granted Ford's Motion for Judgment as to Plaintiffs' implied warranty claim on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to oppose Ford's Motion as to that claim. The Court accordingly entered Judgment for Ford on Plaintiffs' express and implied warranty claims. And, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60 is DENIED in its entirety. (bm)
|
|
Filing 71
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #66 filed by Yvonne Quintero, Salvador Quintero. CCA # 20-55883. The district court's records reflect that appellants timely filed a motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), which is still pending. The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4), and proceedings in this court will be stayed until the district court decides the 9/10/2020 motion. Within 14 days after the district court's decision, appellants must notify this court in writing of the decision and state whether they wish to move forward with this appeal. To challenge the decision on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. Appellants' motion to stay appellate proceedings is denied as unnecessary. (gk)
|
| Filing 70 Objection Defendant's Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs re: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs re: Order,, #64 , Judgment,, #65 , #69 filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Mikhov, Steve) |
| Filing 69 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs re: Order,, #64 , Judgment,, #65 , filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A1-A44 - Invoices, #3 Exhibit B) (Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 68 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 20-55883 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #66 as to Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (gk) |
| Filing 67 DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero re #66 (Rosner, Hallen) |
| Filing 66 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Appeal of Judgment,, #65 , Order,, #64 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Previously Paid on 8/25/2020, Receipt No. 27774728.) (Rosner, Hallen) |
| Filing 65 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: In light of the Court's concurrently-issued Order granting Defendant Ford Motor Company's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [filed under Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx, Docket No. 794], the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of Ford Motor Company as follows: Judgment as a matter of law is granted in favor of Ford and against Plaintiffs as to Plaintiffs' breach of express warranty claim, as to the issue of civil penalties under California Civil Code Section 1794(c), and as to Plaintiffs' breach of implied warranty claim under California Civil Code Section 1791.1. (gk) |
|
Filing 64
ORDER GRANTING FORD'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND DENYING AS MOOT FORD'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court are Defendant Ford Motor Company's ("Ford") Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law ("JMOL") [filed under Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx, Docket No. 794] and Motion for a New Trial [filed under Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx, Docket No. 795]. The Court GRANTS Ford's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. The Judgment on Jury Verdict (Quintero Dkt. No. #62 ) is VACATED. A new separate Judgment will be entered concurrently with this Order. The Court DENIES AS MOOT Ford's Motion for a New Trial. AMENDED to reflect that the Court granted Ford's Motion for Judgment as to Plaintiffs' implied warranty claim on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to oppose Ford's Motion as to that claim. The Court accordingly entered Judgment for Ford on Plaintiffs' express and implied warranty claims. (gk) Modified on 10/26/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 63
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS IN QUINTERO V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY (2:18-cv-01912-AB-FFM) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation [filed under Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx, Docket No. 781], The Court adopts the following briefing schedule: (1) Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs by 7/10/2020, and notice it for hearing on 9/9/2020 at 10:00 AM; (2) Ford's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees shall be filed on 7/31/2020; (3) Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Attorney's Fees shall be filed on 8/14/2020; (4) Ford's Application to Tax Plaintiffs' Costs shall be filed on 7/31/2020; (5) Plaintiffs' Objection to Ford's Application to Tax Plaintiffs' Costs shall be filed on 8/14/2020; (6) Ford's Response to Plaintiffs' Objections to Ford's Application to Tax Plaintiffs' Costs shall be filed on 8/28/2020; and (7) The Court reminds the parties that cost applications and related filings are presented to the Clerk of Court. See Local Rule 54-2. (gk)
|
| Filing 62 JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company as to Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero's claims for Fraudulent Inducement-Concealment, Fraudulent Inducement-Intentional Misrepresentation, and Fraudulent Inducement-Negligent Misrepresentation, and each of these claims is dismissed with prejudice. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero on their claim for Violation of Song-Beverly Act Breach of Express Warranty. Plaintiffs shall recover from Defendant Ford Motor Company the amount of $7,718.61 in stipulated damages and $15,437.20 in civil penalties for Breach of Express Warranty, for a total judgment of $23,155.81 with post-judgment interest thereon at the weekly average one-year constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar week preceding the date of the entry of the judgment, which at the time of entry of judgment is 1.5% per annum. (3) Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero elected the remedy for their claim for Violation of the Song-Beverly Act - Breach of Express Warranty, and furthermore abandoned their claim for Violation of the Song-Beverly Act - Breach of Express Warranty of Merchantability. The Court therefore deems the Implied Warranty claim abandoned. This Court shall decide all issues involving fees, costs, expenses and prejudgment interest by post-verdict motion(s). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
|
Filing 61
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROPOSED JUDGMENT IN QUINTERO et al v. FORD MOTOR COMP ANY, CV 18-01912 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court is Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion to Modify Proposed Judgment [Dkt No. 727 in 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx)]. The Court deems Defendant's Motion to be an Objection, and SUSTAINS it. Defendant objects that Plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment on their breach of the implied warranty claim. The Court agrees. The Court will modify Plaintiff's proposed Judgment to state that Plaintiffs abandoned their implied warranty claim. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 60 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Arlyn L Escalante counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Arlyn L. Escalante as counsel of record for Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Attorney Arlyn L Escalante added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Arlyn L Escalante added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Escalante, Arlyn) |
| Filing 59 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Hallen David Rosner counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Hallen D. Rosner as counsel of record for Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Attorney Hallen David Rosner added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Hallen David Rosner added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Rosner, Hallen) |
|
Filing 58
JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER approved by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (gk)
|
| Filing 57 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings December 10, 2019 at 1:42 p.m.; December 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.; December 12, 2019 at 1:21 p.m.; December 16, 2019 at 2:05 p.m.; and December 17, 2019 at 12:47 p.m. re Transcript #56 , #53 , #54 , #55 , #52 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Cuneo, Patricia) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 56 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on December 17, 2019 at 12:47 p.m. Court Reporter: PAT CUNEO CSR 1600, OFFICIAL REPORTER www.patcuneo.comb. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 2/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/18/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/15/2020. (Cuneo, Patricia) |
| Filing 55 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on December 16, 2019 at 2:05 p.m. Court Reporter: PAT CUNEO CSR 1600, OFFICIAL REPORTER, www.patcuneo.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 2/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/18/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/15/2020. (Cuneo, Patricia) |
| Filing 54 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on December 12, 2019 at 1:21 p.m. Court Reporter: PAT CUNEO CSR 1600, OFFICIAL REPORTER, www.patcuneo.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 2/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/18/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/15/2020. (Cuneo, Patricia) |
| Filing 53 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on December 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Court Reporter: PAT CUNEO CSR 1600, OFFICIAL REPORTER, www.patcuneo.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 2/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/18/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/15/2020. (Cuneo, Patricia) |
| Filing 52 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on December 10, 2019 at 1:42 p.m. Court Reporter: PAT CUNEO CSR 1600, OFFICIAL REPORTER, www.patcuneo.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 2/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/18/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/15/2020. (Cuneo, Patricia) |
|
Filing 51
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES' TO SET BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE REGARDING PROPOSED JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 721], it is hereby ORDERED: (1) Ford's brief objecting to Plaintiffs' proposed form of judgment and seeking resolution of its equitable defense shall be filed by 1/24/2020. (2) Plaintiffs' response to Ford's brief shall be filed by 2/7/2020. (3) Ford's reply brief shall be filed by 2/14/2020. (4) The Court shall set a hearing at its convenience to resolve Ford's objections and, if necessary, to address Ford's equitable defense to Plaintiffs' claims. No judgment shall be entered before resolution of the parties disputes as briefed. (gk)
|
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Notice of Lodging of Plaintiffs' Proposed Judgment on Jury Verdict re Order,, #49 (Attachments: #1 Plaintiffs' Proposed Judgment on Jury Verdict)(Kirnos, Radomir) |
|
Filing 49
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES' TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED JUDGMENT AND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 718], it is hereby ORDERED: (1) That Plaintiffs' deadline to submit a proposed judgment is continued to 1/10/2020; and (2) That, if the parties are unable to stipulate to the form of a proposed judgment by that date, the parties will submit a stipulated briefing and hearing schedule regarding remaining issues by 1/10/2020. (gk)
|
| Filing 47 REDACTED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. (lom) |
| Filing 48 SEALED UNREDACTED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM filed re: Redacted Special Verdict Form #47 . (lom) |
| Filing 46 SEALED UNREDACTED Jury Note No. 1 filed re: REDACTED Jury Note no 1 #45 . (lom) |
| Filing 45 REDACTED Jury Note # 1 filed. (lom) |
| Filing 44 RECEIPT FOR RELEASE OF EXHIBITS to Counsel Upon Verdict/Judgment at Trial; Pursuant to stip of counsel and/or by Order of the Court, all exhibits listed on jOINT exhibits list are returned to counsel for respective party(ies). (lom) |
| Filing 43 LIST OF EXHIBITS AND WITNESSES at trial. (lom) |
| Filing 42 CLOSING JURY INSTRUCTIONS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (lom) |
| Filing 41 MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 5th Day held and completed before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Witnesses called, sworn and testified. Exhibits identified and admitted. Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s) rests. Closing arguments made. Court instructs jury. Bailiff(s) sworn. Jury retires to deliberate. Jury Verdict reached. Jury FINDS: Plaintiff. Jury polled. Filed Witness & Exhibit Lists; jury notes; jury instructions. Motion for Judgment/Directed Verdict by Defendant is denied. Clerk reviewed admitted exhibits with counsel to be submitted to the Jury/Court for deliberation/findings. Counsel stipulate to the return of exhibits upon the conclusion of trial. Exhibit Release Form prepared and filed. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (filed in MDL 18-02814, docket no. 710) is DENIED. Plaintiffs shall file a Proposed Judgment by no later than January 6, 2020. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (lom) |
| Filing 39 TRIAL BRIEF TO EXCLUDE PRODUCTION OF UNREDACTED RETAINER AGREEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero.. (Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 40 MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 4th Day held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Witnesses called, sworn and testified. Exhibits identified and admitted. Jury Trial continued to 12/17/2019 08:15 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (gk) |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 12/9/19, 9:48 A.M re Transcript #37 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Jui, Chia) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 37 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/9/19, 9:48 A.M. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through COURT REPORTER: Chia Mei Jui, CSR, cmjui.csr@gmail.com or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 1/6/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/14/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/13/2020. (Jui, Chia) |
| Filing 36 MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 3rd Day held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Witnesses called, sworn and testified. Exhibits identified and admitted. Motion for mistrial by Plaintiffs and Defendant is denied. Court and counsel confer. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant's Motion to Exclude Garza Video (filed in Case No. ML 18-02814-AB (FFMx), dkt. No. 698). Jury Trial continued to 12/16/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (gk) |
| Filing 35 MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 2nd Day held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Witnesses called, sworn and testified. Exhibits identified and admitted. Jury Trial continued to 12/12/2019 08:30 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (gk) |
| Filing 34 AMENDED MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 1st Day #32 held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Jury is impaneled and sworn. Opening statements made. Motion for mistrial by Defendant is denied. The Court instructs the jury with the Opening Jury Instructions. For the reasons stated on the record, Juror No. 8 is excused. Jury Trial continued to 12/11/2019 09:45 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (gk) |
| Filing 33 OPENING JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Given) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (gk) |
| Filing 32 MINUTES OF Jury Trial - 1st Day held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Opening statements made. Motion for mistrial by Defendant is denied. The Court instructs the jury with the Opening Jury Instructions. For the reasons stated on the record, Juror No. 8 is excused. Jury Trial continued to 12/11/2019 09:45 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui/Patricia Cuneo. (gk) |
| Filing 31 MINUTES OF Pretrial Conference and Motion Hearing held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. RE: Motions in Limine [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document nos. 649, 651, 652, 653, 666, 654, 648, 647, and 650]. The Courtroom Deputy Clerk distributes the Court's tentative ruling prior to the case being called. The Court having carefully considered the papers and the evidence submitted by the parties, and having heard the oral argument of counsel, hereby takes the motions under submission. The Court, having conferred with counsel, allots 10 hours of trial time to each side, excluding openings and closings. Opening statements must not exceed 30 minutes per side, and closing arguments must not exceed 40 minutes per side. The Court and counsel confer re Voir Dire questions, Verdict Form and Jury Instructions. Court Reporter: Chia Mei Jui. (gk) |
|
Filing 30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE IN YVONNE QUINTERO et al. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiffs Yvonne and Salvador Quintero's ("Plaintiffs") Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Litigation Matters and Counsel's Business Practices [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 649] is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Hypothetical Repair Procedures and the Increased Costs to a Consumer as a Result of Implementing Sufficient Repairs or Bringing Lawsuits [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 651] is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Testimony, Argument or Implication that Plaintiffs Did Not Make Sufficient Efforts to Ask Defendant to Repurchase or Replace the Subject Vehicle [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 652] is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 4 to Exclude Testimony of Robert Pascarella [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 653] is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Argument That Plaintiffs Are Not Entitled to Damages or That Damages Should be Reduced Because Plaintiffs No Longer Own the Vehicle They Leased [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 666] is DENIED. Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence of Other Unrelated Incidents [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 654] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument that Ford Does Not Repurchase Vehicles Without A Lawsuit Being Filed [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 648] is DENIED. Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Speculative Lay Opinions [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 647] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude References to Litigation Conduct, and Other Improper Trial Tactics [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 650] is DENIED. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Bryan C Altman counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Bryan C. Altman as counsel of record for Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Plaintiff. (Attorney Bryan C Altman added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Bryan C Altman added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Altman, Bryan) |
|
Filing 28
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DAUBERT MOTIONS AS TO YVONNE QUINTERO et al. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court are Ford's Daubert motions to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff Yvonne and Salvador Quintero's experts Micale [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 462], Darrell Blasjo [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 463], and Barbara Luna [filed under the Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx) as document no. 464]. Defendant's Daubert motions as to the Quintero matter are DENIED AS MOOT. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 27 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 [Unredacted Version of FAC Proposed to be Filed Under Seal] filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Attorney Spencer Peter Hugret added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hugret, Spencer) |
|
Filing 26
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court are Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaints ["Motions" filed under ML 18-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. Nos. 363, 365, 367, 369]. The Motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED only as to Plaintiff Pedante's claim for breach of the implied warranty (Count 2) [Dkt. No. 365 under ML 18-02814 AB (FFMx)]. The Motions are otherwise DENIED. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 25 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos counsel for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Adding Radomir R. Kirnos as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero. (Attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Kirnos, Radomir) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING SEQUENCE OF TRIALS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court ORDERS that the four IDP trial cases shall be tried in this order: (1) Mark Pedante v. Ford Motor Co., CV 17-06656 AB (FFMx), 11/5/2019; (2) Mary Cannon v. Ford Motor Co., CV 18-04817 AB (FFMx), 11/19/2019; (3) Yvonne Quintero et al. v. Ford Motor Co., CV 18-01912 AB (FFMx), 12/10/2019; (4) Christi Brown v. Ford Motor Co., CV 18-04190 AB (FFMx), 1/7/2020. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 23 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Darth Kadei Vaughn counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company. Adding Darth Vaughn as counsel of record for Ford Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney Darth Kadei Vaughn added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Vaughn, Darth) |
| Filing 22 SEALED DOCUMENT re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, #17 , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, #21 filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Higgins, Russell) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #16 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE FOLLOWING PORTIONS OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTS BE FILED UNDER SEAL: 43-55; 57-69; 75- 103; 114-125; 129-132. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Warren E Platt counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company. Adding Warren E. Platt as counsel of record for Defendant Ford Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney Warren E Platt added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Platt, Warren) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel S Rodman counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company. Daniel S. Rodman is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Rodman, Daniel) |
| Filing 18 STATEMENT of in support of Plaintiffs' APPLICATION to file document [First Amended Complaint] under seal #16 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew Fyie)(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 17 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document [First Amended Complaint] under seal #16 filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document, #2 Proof of Service)(Higgins, Russell) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION to file document [First Amended Complaint] under seal filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Redacted Document)(Higgins, Russell) |
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero, Salvador Quintero(Attorney Russell W Higgins added to party Salvador Quintero(pty:pla), Attorney Russell W Higgins added to party Yvonne Quintero(pty:pla))(Higgins, Russell) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court are the Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings that Ford filed in the member cases of the MDL In Re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation. Ford seeks judgment on the pleadings against Canon (member case number 2:18-cv-04817-AB-FFMx) and Brown (member case number 2:18-cv-04190-AB-FFMx) [Motion as to Cannon and Brown filed in 2:18-ml-02814-AB-FFMx, Doc. No. 161], represented by the Consumer Law Group ("CLR"); and against Pedante (member case number 2:17-cv-06656-AB-FFMx) [Motion filed in 2:18-ml-02814-AB-FFMx, Doc. No. 162] and Quintero (member case number 2:18-cv-01912-AB-FFMx) [Motion filed in 2:18-ml-02814-AB-FFMx, Doc. No. 163], represented by the Knight Law Group ("KLG"). The Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings are: (1) GRANTED as to the Warranty Claims asserted in Brown, Cannon, and Quintero. (2) GRANTED as to the Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims based on Ford's Alleged Performance Misrepresentations, asserted in all 4 cases. (3) GRANTED as to the Fraudulent Omission Claims, asserted in all 4 cases. (4) DENIED as to the Warranty Claims asserted in Pedante. (5) DENIED as to the Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims Based on Ford's "Automatic Transmission" Representation, asserted in all 4 cases. Plaintiffs have 21 days from the issuance of this order to file their First Amended Complaints. Any Complaints or claims not amended by that date will be deemed dismissed with prejudice. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Virginia A. Phillips to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01912 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of address by Steve Borislav Mikhov attorney for Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. Changing attorneys address to 10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500, Los Angeles, CA 90067. Filed by Plaintiffs Salvador Quintero, Yvonne Quintero. (Mikhov, Steve) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES PENDING DETERMINATION OF INCLUSION IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PENDING IN THIS DISTRICT (MDL NO. 2814) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips granting #8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case: Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's ex parte application to stay all proceedings and deadlines pending determination on inclusion in In re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2814-AB (FFMx) is GRANTED; 2. This case is stayed, including all responsive pleading deadlines and related briefing schedules, status conferences, and/or discovery deadlines, until further order from the Court. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED. (bm)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER ISSUED upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 16-05 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:18-cv-01912 VAP(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Determination of Inclusion in Multidistrict Litigation Pending In This District (MDL No. 2814) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Katharine H. Adams, #2 Exhibit A - Email, #3 Proposed Order) (Adams, Katharine) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Adams, Katharine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814- 150 Related Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Related Action to MDL No. 2814, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiffs' Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - MDL Transfer Order, #4 Exhibit D - Amended Schedule of Related Actions, #5 Exhibit E - MDL Amended Proof of Service)(Adams, Katharine) |
| CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/1/2018, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation, Evercore Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock, Inc., The Vanguard Group. (Adams, Katharine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Adams, Katharine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC692633 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 03/07/2018, receipt number 0973-21374835 or 2689C01I), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Ford's Answer, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of Adams ISO Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of Hugret ISO Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F - Ford's 2016 Form 10-K) (Attorney Katharine Haldorsen Adams added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Adams, Katharine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
