Ricardo D. Arcega v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Ricardo D. Arcega |
| Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln, Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford a California Corporation doing business as Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv01988 |
| March 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega.(Kirnos, Radomir) |
Filing 24
ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #23 , Defendant shall pay the sum of $4,440.14 to Plaintiff and Plaintiff hereby agrees to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. Defendant shall pay the sum of $4,440.14 to Plaintiff within 60 days of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the control of Defendant cause delay. The parties are ORDERED to file a Stipulation of Dismissal within ten days of the issuance of this Order. (gk)
|
| Filing 23 STIPULATION for Attorney Fees in the amount of $4,440.14 filed by Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation regarding Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses)(Kirnos, Radomir) |
| Filing 22 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos counsel for Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega. Adding Roger Kirnos as counsel of record for Ricardo D. Arcega for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega. (Attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos added to party Ricardo D. Arcega(pty:pla))(Kirnos, Radomir) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Amir Nassihi for Defendants Ford Motor Company and Johnson Ford dbaAntelope Valley Ford Lincoln in place of Attorneys Randolph T. Moore and Sarah M. Ayad #20 . (gk)
|
| Filing 20 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Amir Nassihi in place of attorney Sarah M. Ayad filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party Johnson Ford(pty:dft)) (Nassihi, Amir) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Change of address by Steve Borislav Mikhov attorney for Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega. Changing attorneys address to 10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500, Los Angeles, CA 90067. Filed by Plaintiff Ricardo D. Arcega. (Mikhov, Steve) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES PENDING DETERMINATION OF INCLUSION IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PENDING IN THIS DISTRICT (MDL NO. 2814) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Ex Parte Application to stay all proceedings and deadlines pending determination on inclusion in In re: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2814-AB (FFMx) #10 is GRANTED. This case is stayed, including all responsive pleading deadlines and related briefing schedules, status conferences, and/or discovery deadlines, until further order from the Court. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED. (gk)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:12-cv-08388 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh and Judge John F. Walter to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01988 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: [Proposed] Order #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Other Filings- Notice- Notice of Lodging. This document is tendered for the judges approval and should have been submitted as a separate PDF attachment to a Notice of Lodging. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should be emailed to the chambers generic email address. Motion event utilized in docketing this filing: Clerk has terminated the Motion event created by document 12 only, which is a proposed order. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by chambers of Judge John F. Walter. Courtesy copies of all case opening documents shall be delivered to chambers by 10:30 a.m. on March 28, 2018. (Refer to Court's Standing Order and Local Rule 5-4.5) Failure to comply may result in an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal and/or Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Rules.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 16-05 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:18-cv-01988 JFW(PJWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 12 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES PENDING DETERMINATION OF INCLUSION IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PENDING IN THIS DISTRICT (MDL NO. 2814) [PROPOSED ORDER] filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. (Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Sarah Ayad in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending DETERMINATION OF INCLUSION IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PENDING IN THIS DISTRICT (MDL NO. 2814) #10 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email)(Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending DETERMINATION OF INCLUSION IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PENDING IN THIS DISTRICT (MDL NO. 2814) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - CTO-5) (Ayad, Sarah) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed in state court on 3/5/18 (attached as exhibit to Errata docket no.8) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company.(lc) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS (MDL No. 2814-AB (FFMx)) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - MDL Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Original Summons/Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1), #4 Exhibit D - Amended Proof Of Service (MDL))(Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Johnson Ford. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conformed Answer)(Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Ayad, Sarah) |
| NON CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company and Johnson Ford, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ricardo D. Arcega in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/5/2018, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock, Inc., Vanguard Group. (Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln.. (Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln. (Ayad, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC692908 Receipt No: 0973-21387903 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln, Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons POS, #3 Exhibit C - Answer, #4 Exhibit D - Dec of S. Ayad, #5 Exhibit E - Dec of S. Hugret, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Sarah M Ayad added to party Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Sarah M Ayad added to party Johnson Ford, a California Corporation, dba Antelope Valley Ford Lincoln(pty:dft))(Ayad, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
