Azhar Lal v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Azhar Lal |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D Castro, John Doe No 1, John Doe No 2 Dr. Edwards, John Does, D Pixley and T Rhodes |
| 2:2018cv02056 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
JUDGMENT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 126 . IT IS ADJUDGED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 76) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 122 . IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered granting Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76) and dismissing this action with prejudice. (et)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 50 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (et)
|
|
Filing
13
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the deadline. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. For the reasons discussed above, the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and thus it must be dismissed. Because it is not absolute ly clear that the Complaint's deficiencies cannot be cured by amendment, dismissal is with leave to amend. Accordingly, if Plaintiff desires to pursue his claims, he must file a First Amended Complaint within thirty-five (35) days of the date of this Order, remedying the deficiencies discussed above. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
