Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford seeks a declaratory judgment that the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release; Assignment of Copyright and Non-Disparagment Agreement between her and Defendants Donald J. Trump and Essential Consultants, LLC were never formed, are invalid under the doctrine of unconscionability, or are void because they are illegal or violate public policy. Plaintiff also alleged that Defendant Michael Cohen defamed her when he stated that the relationship between Stephanie Clifford and Donald J. Trump was not true.
Stephanie Clifford |
Michael Cohen, Does, Essential Consultants, LLC and Donald J. Trump |
2:2018cv02217 |
March 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Frederick F. Mumm |
S. James Otero |
Other |
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford, (Avenatti, Michael) |
Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford(Avenatti, Michael) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice (Other) 7 by Judge S. James Otero. The document is accepted as filed. (lc) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE:Essential Consultants Notice (Other) 7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Errata. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE filed by Defendant Essential Consultants, LLC. (Blakely, Brent) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford in Los Angeles Superior Court on 3/6/2018, and attached to the Notice of Removal as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Donald J. Trump, (Attorney Charles J Harder added to party Donald J. Trump(pty:dft))(Harder, Charles) |
Filing 5 JOINDER filed by Defendant Donald J. Trump joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 . (Harder, Charles) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Essential Consultants, LLC identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Blakely, Brent) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Essential Consultants, LLC, (Blakely, Brent) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Essential Consultants, LLC. (Blakely, Brent) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC696568 Receipt No: 0973-21427334 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Essential Consultants, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Brent H Blakely added to party Essential Consultants, LLC(pty:dft))(Blakely, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.