Lawrence Cardoza v. D. Asuncion et al
Lawrence Cardoza |
Warden D. Asuncion, Correctional Officer D. Barbato, D. Pixley, J. Plascencia, G. Salcedo and Correctional Officer C. Spencer |
2:2018cv02223 |
March 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Manuel L. Real |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Action for Lack of Prosecution, IT IS ADJUDGED that the complaint is dismissed and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (clee) |
Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before June 1, 2018, why the complaint should not be dismissed for failure to pay the required filing fees and costs. Plaintiff may discharge this Order to Show Cause by submitting a complete Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form AO 240) with all the required doc umentation by no later than June 1, 2018. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a timely response to this Order to Show Cause may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b); L.R. 41-1. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.