Timothy Ray Baker v. F. Villalobos et al
| Timothy Ray Baker |
| R. Archambo, A. Castro, E. Cordero, M. Godina, B. Pabon, R. Pabon, J. Ramsey and Sergeant F. Villalobos |
| 2:2018cv02301 |
| March 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED THAT the above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 115 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 45 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1)The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. (2)Based on Plaintiff's req uest for voluntary dismissal, Defendants Cordero, Archambo, and Ramsey are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (3) This action now proceeds against: (a) Defendants Villalobos, Castro, B. Pabon, and R. Pabon on Plaintiffs excessive force claim; and (b) Defendants Villalobos, B. Pabon, and R. Pabon on Plaintiff'sdeliberate indifference claim; (4) all remaining claims and Defendants are DISMISSED from this action. (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
