Raquel Hernandez v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Raquel Hernandez |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv02584 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-07124-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:12-cv-08388 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-02584 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-2584 DDP (Ex). This case was assigned to MJDAP in error should have been assign to Discovery matter. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 Declaration, 3 Certificate of Service should not have been attached. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Raquel Hernandez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/26/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, (Efstratis, H) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC696236 Receipt No: 0973-21503304 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate of Service) (Attorney H Paul Efstratis added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Efstratis, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
