Jason Frank et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Miryan Frank and Jason Frank |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2018cv02681 |
| April 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-07124-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Miscellaneous Filings > Amended Document (Non-Motion). The filer used the event, Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), for docketing this filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from LOS ANGELES, case number BC696231 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 04/03/2018, receipt number 0972-7587182), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration)(May, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:12-cv-08388 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-02681 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Jason Frank and Miryan Frank in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/26/2018; attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company identifying State Street Corporation as Corporate Parent. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC696231 Receipt No: 0973-21516230 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
