Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC et al v. Munchkin, Inc.
| Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company, Ltd |
| Munchkin Inc |
| Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC |
| Adam D Swain |
| Munchkin Inc |
| 2:2018cv03005 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
667
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ORDER 666 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Plaintiffs Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC, International Refills Company Ltd., and Angelcare USA LLC and Defendant Munchkin, Inc. (each a "Party" and together the "Parties") agree and stipulate that this case has been settled and resolved to the Parties' satisfaction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and their settlement agreement, the Parties stipulate and agree that the above-captioned case be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each Party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm)
|
|
Filing
394
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
147
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: re Stipulation for Protective Order 143 . (NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT). See document for details.) (sbou)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
