William J. Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II et al
| William J Jones |
| Correctional Officer Coffman, Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II, Captain W. Cotter, Correctional Officer Cribbs, Correctional Officer Heavener or Heavenly, Sergeant Ibarra, Sergeant Leahy, Correctional Officer Reveles, Sergeant Roacha, Correctional Officer Sasin, Warden Stu Sherman, M. Solario, Captain M. Solario and Lieutenant Ward |
| 2:2018cv03023 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is strongly encouraged to utilize the standard civil rights complaint form when filing any amended complaint, a copy of which is attached. Plaintiff is fur ther advised that if he no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may voluntarily dismiss it by filing a Notice of Dismissal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). A form Notice of Dismissal is attached for Plaintiffs' convenience. (See document for further details). (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
