Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| DOES, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Twin City Fire Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv03051 |
| April 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: In accordance with the Courts January 31, 2022 Order Granting Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, Pa.s (National Union) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 118), final judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant National Union and against plaintiff Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and this action shall be dismissed on its merits. National Union shall recover its costs. (shb)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING 97 for Summary Judgment in favor of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. against National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Triable Issue of Material Fact Exists 97 . MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (shb)
|
|
Filing
35
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: re Stipulation for Protective Order 34 . (See document.) (sbou)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
