Carmen John Perri v. Advance America et al
| Carmen John Perri |
| ADVANCE AMERICA, a business of unknown form, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Ramin Farzam and Advance America |
| 2:2018cv03615 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) #33 , the Court dismisses the action, in its entirety, with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own respective fees and costs. (gk)
|
| Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by defendant Advance America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal of Entire Case With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))(Roller, Amber) |
|
Filing 32
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of the parties' notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety #31 , this action is placed in inactive status. By 10/1/2018, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of 10/2/2018. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The Order to Show Cause dated 8/27/2018 is discharged #30 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Settlement and response to OSC filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 30
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing no later than 9/4/2018, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. The scheduling conference on 9/7/2018 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. (jp)
|
| Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, re Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #20 as to Advance America served on 7/24/18. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, re Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #20 as to Ramin Farzam served on 7/24/18. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 27
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On July 20, 2018, the Court received Defendant Advance America's answer #22 . On July 24, 2018, the clerk entered default as to Defendant Ramin Farzam #26 . The Order to Show Cause dated July 10, 2018 #21 is hereby DISCHARGED. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within 30 days after a final disposition of the pending claims against all remaining defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 26 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Ramin Farzam. (gk) |
| Filing 25 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/24/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 9/7/2018 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 24 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against DEFENDANT Ramin Farzam filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Advance America identifying Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Roller, Amber) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 by Defendant Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC filed by Defendant Advance America.(Attorney Amber L Roller added to party Advance America(pty:dft))(Roller, Amber) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 7/24/2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendant(s); or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 20 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 19
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassignment Pursuant to General Order 16-05 filed on July 2, 2018. See document for requirements. (lom)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-03615 DMG(PJWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R.Wilner to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-03615 CAS(PJWx). (rn) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. RE: Advance America (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROOF OF SERVICE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The previous order is DISCHARGED with no further consequence. re: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . (vm)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Ramin Farzam served on 5/9/2018, answer due 5/30/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Advance America served on 5/8/2018, answer due 5/29/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) plus proof of service of process by or before June 12, 2018. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ramin Farzam. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Advance America. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21668741 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Carmen John Perri(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
