Jonathan Payton v. Bidding Unlimited Incorporated, et al
| Jonathan Payton |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them, Bidding Unlimited Incorporated and Bidding Unlimited Incorporated doing business as Bidz.com |
| 2:2018cv03657 |
| May 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Charles F Eick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Bidding Unlimited Incorporated. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Payton. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Payton. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Payton, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21677481 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Payton. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Jonathan Payton(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
