Rory Anderson v. R.M. Galicia, Inc., et al
| Rory Anderson |
| Does 1-10, inclusive, and each of them, R.M. Galicia, Inc. and R.M. Galicia, Inc. doing business as Progressive Management Systems |
| 2:2018cv03939 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant R.M. Galicia, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rory Anderson. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rory Anderson, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rory Anderson. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21735403 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rory Anderson. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Rory Anderson(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
