Alejandro Castro v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Alejandro Castro |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv03958 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-02732-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FOR COORDINATION WITH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS defendants ex parte motion. This case is STAYED pending a final decision by the JPML whether to transfer this case for inclusion in the MDL. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. #4 (yl)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-03958 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (esa) |
| Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Determination of Transfer for Coordination with Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings Related Case(s): MLD 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A to F)(Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC702731 Receipt No: 0973-21737288 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A and B, #2 Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jeffrey P Wilson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Alejandro Castro, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 4/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service, on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 33) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Alejandro Castro. (Filed in state court 4/13/18, submittedas document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
