Monica Farmer v. Ford Motor Company, et al
| Monica Farmer |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv04059 |
| May 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-02732-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and Judge Philip S. Gutierrez to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04059 AB (FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (esa)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FOR COORDINATION WITH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez #5 . The Court GRANTS defendant's ex parte motion. This case is STAYED pending a final decision by the JPML whether to transfer this case for inclusion in the MDL. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED. In the event the case is not transferred within 60 days, the parties are ordered to submit a status report. NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. (pso)
|
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Monica Farmer, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 4/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service, on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Monica Farmer. (Filed in state court 4/13/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Determination of Inclusion in Multidistrict Litigation Pending in this District (MDL 2814) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (May, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC703342 Receipt No: 0973-21756714 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
