Craig Schmitman v. Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc. et al
| Craig Schmitman |
| Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc., Does 1-10, and each of them, inclusive, Marv Golden Pilot Supplies and Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc. doing business as MarvGolden.com |
| 2:2018cv04185 |
| May 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc., (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc..(Vanderhoof, Brian) |
Filing 13
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04185 RSWL(AGRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc. answer now due 6/28/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc..(Attorney Brian C Vanderhoof added to party Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc.(pty:dft))(Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman, upon Defendant Marv Golden Pilot Supplies served on 5/24/2018, answer due 6/14/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon MARVIN GOLDEN, PRESIDENT, MARV GOLDEN PILOT SUPPLIES in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman, upon Defendant Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc. served on 5/24/2018, answer due 6/14/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon MARVIN GOLDEN, PRESIDENT, MARV GOLDEN DISCOUNT SALES, INC. d/b/a MARVGOLDEN.COM in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Marv Golden Discount Sales, Inc., Marv Golden Pilot Supplies. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman, (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Craig Schmitman. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman. (Ridley, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21774646 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Craig Schmitman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits Part 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibits Part 2) (Attorney Eric D Ridley added to party Craig Schmitman(pty:pla))(Ridley, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
