Adam George v. Arash Hashemi et al
Plaintiff: Adam George
Defendant: Arash Hashemi, Does 1 through 10 and Arash Hashemi individually doing business as Law Offices of Arash Hashemi
Case Number: 2:2018cv04215
Filed: May 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2018 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Arash Hashemi, (Hashemi, Arash)
June 27, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Other error(s) with document(s): The image attached to this entry is the Answer that was previously filed. The certificate of interested parties needs to be a separate entry on the docket and not submitted as an attachment. The correct event is: Notices > Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo)
June 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/30/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 8/13/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (et)
June 26, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Arash Hashemi, (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Hashemi, Arash)
June 25, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo)
June 22, 2018 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Arash Hashemi.(Attorney Arash Hashemi added to party Arash Hashemi(pty:dft))(Hashemi, Arash)
June 18, 2018 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam George, upon Defendant Arash Hashemi served on 6/1/2018, answer due 6/22/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Evelyn Doe - Front Desk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen)
May 22, 2018 Filing 9 STANDING ORDER Re Final Pre-Trial Conference for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu. (See Order further details). (et)
May 18, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Arash Hashemi. (et)
May 18, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
May 18, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
May 18, 2018 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adam George. (Doniger, Stephen)
May 18, 2018 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Adam George. (Doniger, Stephen)
May 18, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adam George. (Doniger, Stephen)
May 18, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam George, (Doniger, Stephen)
May 18, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21779497 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Adam George. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Adam George(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adam George v. Arash Hashemi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arash Hashemi
Represented By: Arash Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arash Hashemi individually doing business as Law Offices of Arash Hashemi
Represented By: Arash Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam George
Represented By: Frank Gregory Casella
Represented By: Stephen M Doniger
Represented By: Scott A Burroughs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?