Norma Luna v. Ford Motor Company et al
Norma Patino Luna |
Ford Motor Company, Central Ford and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2018cv04305 |
May 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Frederick F Mumm |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04251-AB-FFM et al. (gk) |
(CONFORMED COPY) ANSWER to Complaint #1 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company and Central Ford. [Filed stamped on 5/22/2018 by Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC703347] (Attorney H Paul Efstratis added to party Central Ford(pty:dft), Attorney Taylor Ford Sullivan added to party Central Ford(pty:dft), Attorney Kristina Obradovic Lambert added to party Central Ford(pty:dft))(gk) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Central Ford, Ford Motor Company, re Declaration #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on June 12, 2018. (Efstratis, H) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Answer of Defendant Ford Motor Company re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Efstratis, H) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 16-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:18-cv-04305 AB(FFMx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (rn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
CONFORMED COPY ORIGINAL FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Central Ford, Does 1 through 10, inclusive Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Norma Patino Luna. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/13/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of H. Paul Efstratis re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Lambert, Kristina) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; The Vanguard Group. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lambert, Kristina) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Lambert, Kristina) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC703347 Receipt No: 0973-21792153 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Answer, #2 State Court Proof of Service) (Attorney Kristina Obradovic Lambert added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Lambert, Kristina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.