Seohee Corporation v. YNJ Fashion gateway, Inc et al
SEOHEE CORPORATION |
YNJ FASHION GATEWAY, INC., DOES 1-10, inclusive, HAI JIN LEE, YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc and YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc a California corporation doing business as Trendy Style Wholesale |
2:2018cv04368 |
May 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
John F Walter |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by Plaintiff Seohee Corporation. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Seohee Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 14 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Hai Jin Lee, YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc. (iv) |
Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendants Hai Jin Lee, YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc filed by Plaintiff Seohee Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Chan Yong Jeong) (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Seohee Corporation, upon Defendant YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc served on 6/13/2018, answer due 7/5/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon HAI JIN LEE, AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Seohee Corporation, upon Defendant Hai Jin Lee served on 6/13/2018, answer due 7/5/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon HAI JIN LEE in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04368 JFW(SKx). (rn) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Hai Jin Lee, YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc. (shb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jp) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by SEOHEE CORPORATION. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SEOHEE CORPORATION. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SEOHEE CORPORATION, (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SEOHEE CORPORATION. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21797340 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff SEOHEE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Attorney Chan Yong Jeong added to party SEOHEE CORPORATION(pty:pla))(Jeong, Chan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.