Christopher Brown v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Christopher Brown |
| Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Sunrise Ford of North Hollywood |
| 2:2018cv04386 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04317-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC702855 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 05/23/2018, receipt number 0973-21798454), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Original Service of Process, #3 Exhibit C - Initial Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - Remand Order)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-04188; MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Initial Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Remand Order, #3 Exhibit C - Transfer Order, #4 Exhibit D - Original Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - MDL CTO-1, #6 Exhibit F - MDL CTO-2, #7 Exhibit G - MDL CTO-3, #8 Exhibit H - JPML Amended POS)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. correcting Notice of Related Case(s), #12 (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. correcting Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Charles F. Harlow re Declaration #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Amended Declaration of Counsel In Support of Removal filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. correcting Declaration #3 Regarding Declaration of Counsel in Support of Removal (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-04188; MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Initial Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Remand Order, #3 Exhibit C - MDL Transfer Order, #4 Exhibit D - Original Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - MDL CTO-1, #6 Exhibit F - MDL CTO-2, #7 Exhibit G - MDL CTO-3, #8 Exhibit H - JPML Amended POS)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04386 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Christopher Brown. Filed in State Court on 4/13/18 Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - CTO-1, #4 Exhibit D - CTO-2, #5 Exhibit E - CTO-3, #6 Exhibit F - JPML Amended POS)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Charles F. Harlow re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC702855 Receipt No: 0973-21798454 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Original Service of Process, #3 Exhibit C - Initial Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - Remand Order) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
