Deborah Smith et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Deborah Smith and Mark Butterfield |
| Ford Motor Company |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv04453 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04317-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Lodging #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: The docket entry indicates that the filing is a Notice of Lodging of the Answer by Defendant. An Answer is not attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on June 28, 2018. (Efstratis, H) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Answer of Defendant Ford Motor Company re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Efstratis, H) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04453 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jp) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL FILED COMPLAINT filed by plaintiffs Deborah Smith, Mark Butterfield against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demand. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/13/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHMENT NO. 1 OF EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; The Vanguard Group. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC702879 Receipt No: 0973-21805914 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Taylor Ford Sullivan added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Sullivan, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
