Sarah Johnson v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Sarah Johnson
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Sacramento and Does 1 through 10, inclulsive
Case Number: 2:2018cv04568
Filed: May 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04497-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
June 25, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Supplement #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: A conformed copy of an Answer by Defendants Ford Motor Company and Autonation Ford Torrance filed stamped on 5/23/2018 by Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC703318, is attached. However, the defendants in this case are Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Sacramento. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
June 5, 2018 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Sacramento. (Efstratis, H)
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04568 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
May 29, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
May 29, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa)
May 25, 2018 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS executed by Plaintiff Sarah Johnson, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 4/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service,by service on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
May 25, 2018 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Sacramento, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Sarah Johnson. (Filed in state court 4/13/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
May 25, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Lambert, Kristina)
May 25, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; The Vanguard Group. (Lambert, Kristina)
May 25, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC703318 Receipt No: 0973-21817279 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Kristina Obradovic Lambert added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Lambert, Kristina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sarah Johnson v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Kristina Obradovic Lambert
Represented By: Harry Paul Efstratis
Represented By: Taylor Ford Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Future Ford of Sacramento
Represented By: Harry Paul Efstratis
Represented By: Taylor Ford Sullivan
Represented By: Kristina Obradovic Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclulsive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Johnson
Represented By: Allen-Michel D Resnick
Represented By: John Neil Gieleghem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?