Jeffrey Fountain v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Jeffrey Fountain |
| Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv04578 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04523-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04578 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Fountain, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 4/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service, by service on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Jeffrey Fountain. (Filed in state court 4/13/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center, identifying State Street Corporation. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of STEPHEN H. DYE re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Yucca Valley Ford Center. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC703093 Receipt No: 0973-21816269 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Yucca Valley Ford Center, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Richard J May added to party Yucca Valley Ford Center(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
