Krista Schroeder v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Krista Schroeder |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv04684 |
| May 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04523-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Lodging #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: The docket entry indicates that the filing is a Notice of Lodging of the Answer by Defendant. An Answer is not attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on June 28, 2018. (Efstratis, H) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Answer of Defendant Ford Motor Company re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Efstratis, H) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04684 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Krista Schroeder. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/13/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, (Efstratis, H) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Efstratis, H) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC702961 Receipt No: 0973-21823927 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney H Paul Efstratis added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Efstratis, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
