Tiffany Curtiss v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Tiffany Curtiss |
| Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Chino Hills Ford |
| 2:2018cv04717 |
| May 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04717-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-04717 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Tiffany Curtiss, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 4/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service, by service on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Chino Hills Ford, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Tiffany Curtiss. (Filed in state court 4/13/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - CTO-1, #4 Exhibit D - CTO-2, #5 Exhibit E - CTO-3, #6 Exhibit F - JPML Amended POS)(Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Chino Hills Ford, (Attorney Jeffrey P Wilson added to party Chino Hills Ford(pty:dft))(Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Jeffrey P. Wilson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC703302 Receipt No: 0973-21827634 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Original Service of Process) (Attorney Jeffrey P Wilson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Wilson, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
