Marquise DeAngelo Loftis v. S. Montes et al
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis |
Captain J. Anderson, Warden Asuncion, Sergeant Burmudez, Fuentes, Sergeant M. Mojjaro and Correctional Officer S. Montes |
2:2018cv04769 |
May 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J. Standish |
John F. Walter |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 59 by Judge John F. Walter. The matter is dismissed with prejudice; Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Filing 45 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 44 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; (Dkt. 36.) (3) Within 14 days of this Order, Defendants shall file and serve an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint. (efc) |
Filing 34 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 30 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to: a)Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Montes based on the PM medication release incident; b) Defendants' request for dismissal based on qualified immunity, without prejudice. (3) Def endants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as follows: c) Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Montes based on the shower incident is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; d) Plaintiff's retaliation claim ag ainst Defendant Fuentes based on the shower incident is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; and e) Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Fuentes based on the PM medication release incident is DISMISSED with leave to amend. (See order for full details) (ec) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.