David M Doyle v. Fast Advance Funding, LLC
Plaintiff: David M Doyle
Defendant: Fast Advance Funding, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv05412
Filed: June 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 22 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety, as to the only Defendant, FAST ADVANCE FUNDING LLC. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Order to Show Cause dated 4/10/2019 21 is discharged. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David M Doyle v. Fast Advance Funding, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fast Advance Funding, LLC
Represented By: Kimberly Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?