Michael A. Perdomo v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department
Michael A. Perdomo |
Deputy Lee, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Jim McDonnell and RN Oquenos |
2:2018cv05506 |
June 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L. Real |
Michael R. Wilner |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action. (Docket 72). This action is dismissed with prejudice. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 72 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm) |
Filing 37 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF LAWYER AND DISMISSAL MOTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiffs response to this order and his substantive response will be due by July 5. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Filing 6 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: EXHAUSTION OF CLAIM by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff will submit a detailed statement (not to exceed five pages) explaining the status of his administrative grievance, the next anticipated step, and whether and when the pre-lawsuit grievance process will be completed. Plaintiffs submission will be due by August 3. Alternatively, a notice of dismissal filed by August 3 will serve to dischargethis order. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.