Altair Instruments, Inc. v. QVC, Inc. et al
| Altair Instruments, Inc. |
| DOES 1 through 10, HoMedics USA, LLC and QVC, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv05799 |
| July 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Manuel L Real |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Altair Instruments, Inc.. (Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Altair Instruments, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:15-cv-08115; 2:17-cv-00876; 2:17-cv-00880; 2:17-cv-00894; 2:17-cv-00898; 2:17-cv-00942; 2:17-cv-05172 (Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Altair Instruments, Inc., (Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Altair Instruments, Inc.. (Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Altair Instruments, Inc.. (Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22025794 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Altair Instruments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Ronald P Oines added to party Altair Instruments, Inc.(pty:pla))(Oines, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
