Blue Gem Sunglasses, Inc. v. The Hartford et al
Blue Gem Sunglasses, Inc. |
The Hartford, Does 1-50 and Sentinel Insurance Company |
2:2018cv05825 |
July 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, The Hartford. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Blue Gem Sunglasses, Inc. Filed in State Court on 6/7/18 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 . (car) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT The Hartford, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 07/03/2018. (Downs, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Hartford, identifying Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.; Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Downs, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Hartford. (Downs, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara Superior Court, case number 18CV02825 Receipt No: 0973-22029158 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant The Hartford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Return of Service and Summons) (Attorney Andrew B Downs added to party The Hartford(pty:dft))(Downs, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.